【２０２３年最新版】IELTSライティングタスク２： 6.5を取るための10のコツと例題と回答例

IELTSライティングタスク２でバンド6.5を取るには

記事の信ぴょう性
Koyuki
英語指導歴２７年。殿堂入り・大賞受賞講師
英検１級
IELTS 7.0　(スピーキング・リーディング7.5)
ケンブリッジ大学認定CELTA保持
普通教員免許　英語（中学・高校）保持

１０のコツ　これだけは

• タスクに適切に回答する
  最初に、タスクに適切に回答することが重要です。タスクに対するアウトラインを作成し、論点を整理しましょう。質問に回答する前に、タスクの文言を再確認することが大切です。
• アウトラインを作成する
  アウトラインは、タスクに対する答えを整理するために重要なツールです。アウトラインを作成することで、考えを整理し、論点を明確にすることができます。
• 論理的な構成を持たせる
  論理的な構成を持たせることが大切です。はじめに導入を行い、次に論点を提示し、最後にまとめを行いましょう。構成が論理的であれば、読者に対する説得力が高まります。
• 論点に集中する
  論点に集中することが大切です。答えに関係のない情報を書くことは避け、正確かつ簡潔な言葉を使いましょう。また、論点に関係する例や詳細を含めることで、答えの説得力が増します。
• 記述に明確さを持たせる
  記述に明確さを持たせることも大切です。適切な文法、語彙、表現を使い、明確な文章を書きましょう。また、論点に対して明確な意見を持ち、それを主張することが重要です。
• 正確な情報を提供する
  正確な情報を提供することも必要です。データや統計情報を含めることで、答えの説得力を高めることができます。ただし、情報を提供する際には、信頼できる情報源を利用することが大切です。
• 時間配分に注意する
  時間配分に注意することも重要です。タスク1とタスク2の時間配分を決め、実践的な練習を行うことが必要です。また、タスク2には40分間の制限があるため、時間を管理することが大切です。
• リーディングとリスニングを活用する
  リーディングやリスニングのスキルを活用することも重要です。タスク2では、多くの場合、読解力や聴解力が求められます。したがって、模擬試験や練習問題を用いて、リーディングやリスニングのスキルを向上させることが重要です。
• 模範回答を参考にする
  模範回答を参考にすることも大切です。模範回答は、タスクに対する回答の構成や論点、語彙、表現に関する良い例を提供してくれます。模範回答を研究し、自分の答えに反映することで、スキルを向上させることができます。
• フィードバックを受け取る
  最後に、フィードバックを受け取ることが大切です。練習問題を解き、他の人に自分の答えを見てもらい、フィードバックを受け取ることで、自分の課題や弱点を明確にすることができます。また、フィードバックを元に改善点を洗い出し、改善を図ることが重要です。
  
  
  

IELTSライティングタスク２　バンド6.5レベル　例題と回答例

例題１

【例題1】
Some people believe that children should be allowed to watch whatever they want on television. Others believe that this should be restricted. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

【バンド6.5の回答例】
Television has become an integral part of our daily lives, and it is a source of entertainment for children as well. While some people believe that children should have unrestricted access to whatever they want to watch on TV, others think that this should be regulated. I believe that there should be some limitations on what children can watch on TV.

On the one hand, those who advocate for unrestricted access to TV argue that it helps children develop a sense of independence and autonomy. They also believe that children should have the freedom to choose what they want to watch, as long as it is not harmful to their well-being. Moreover, they argue that parents should not be overly restrictive as this may hinder children’s emotional and social development.

On the other hand, those who argue for restrictions believe that some TV programs and movies can have a negative impact on children’s behavior and attitudes. They also argue that children are not mature enough to make informed decisions about what is appropriate for them to watch. Moreover, they believe that it is the responsibility of parents and caregivers to ensure that children are exposed to content that is appropriate for their age and developmental stage.

In my opinion, there should be some limitations on what children can watch on TV. While it is important to allow children to have some autonomy, it is equally important to ensure that they are not exposed to harmful content. Parents and caregivers should be aware of what their children are watching and should regulate it accordingly. They should also talk to their children about the potential risks associated with certain TV programs and movies.

In conclusion, while there are arguments for both unrestricted and restricted access to TV, I believe that there should be some limitations on what children can watch. Parents and caregivers should play an active role in regulating what their children watch and should also educate them about the potential risks associated with certain types of content.

例題２

【例題2】
Some people believe that globalization has a positive impact on our world, while others believe that it has a negative impact. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

【バンド6.5の回答例】
Globalization has become a buzzword in recent years, and it refers to the increasing interconnectedness of the world’s economies, societies, and cultures. While some people believe that globalization has a positive impact on our world, others argue that it has a negative impact. In my opinion, globalization has both positive and negative effects.

On the one hand, those who argue for the positive effects of globalization believe that it has led to economic growth and increased prosperity around the world. They also argue that it has led to greater cultural exchange and understanding, as people from different countries interact and learn from one another. Moreover, they argue that globalization has led to greater political cooperation and collaboration between countries.

On the other hand, those who argue for the negative effects of globalization believe that it has led to increased inequality and exploitation, particularly in developing countries. They also argue that it has led to the homogenization of cultures and the loss of cultural diversity. Moreover, they argue that globalization has led to the domination of powerful countries and corporations over weaker ones, resulting in the erosion of national sovereignty.

In my opinion, while globalization has undoubtedly had positive effects on our world, it has also had negative effects that cannot be ignored. The challenge is to mitigate the negative effects while maximizing the positive ones. This requires a comprehensive approach that takes into account the interests of all stakeholders, including individuals, communities, and countries.

To achieve this, governments should regulate the activities of multinational corporations and ensure that they adhere to high standards of social and environmental responsibility. They should also invest in education and training to equip people with the skills they need to compete in a globalized world. Moreover, they should promote cultural exchange and understanding to foster a sense of global citizenship and belonging.

In conclusion, while globalization has both positive and negative effects, it is important to recognize that it is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that requires a nuanced approach. Governments, businesses, and individuals should work together to harness the positive effects of globalization while mitigating the negative ones. This will require cooperation, collaboration, and a shared commitment to building a more just and equitable world.

https://www.italki.com/en/teacher/2461918

例題３

【例題3】
In some countries, fast food restaurants and supermarkets are replacing traditional local food markets. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend?

【バンド6.5の回答例】
In many countries, traditional local food markets are being replaced by fast food restaurants and supermarkets. While some people see this as a positive trend, others argue that it has negative consequences. In my opinion, there are both advantages and disadvantages to this trend.

On the one hand, those who argue for the advantages of fast food restaurants and supermarkets argue that they offer convenience and choice to consumers. They also argue that they are more efficient and cost-effective than traditional local food markets, which often involve haggling and bargaining. Moreover, they argue that fast food restaurants and supermarkets offer a wider variety of foods, including imported and exotic foods that may not be available at local food markets.

On the other hand, those who argue for the disadvantages of this trend believe that it has negative consequences for local economies and cultures. They argue that traditional local food markets are an important source of livelihood for many people, including small-scale farmers and artisans. Moreover, they argue that local food markets promote local foods and culinary traditions, which are important for preserving cultural diversity.

In my opinion, while fast food restaurants and supermarkets offer convenience and choice to consumers, they also have negative consequences for local economies and cultures. The challenge is to find a balance between the two. This requires a comprehensive approach that takes into account the interests of all stakeholders, including consumers, producers, and communities.

To achieve this, governments should regulate the activities of fast food restaurants and supermarkets to ensure that they do not undermine local food markets. They should also promote local foods and culinary traditions through education and marketing campaigns. Moreover, they should support small-scale farmers and artisans through subsidies and other forms of assistance.

In conclusion, while the trend towards fast food restaurants and supermarkets has both advantages and disadvantages, it is important to recognize that it has negative consequences for local economies and cultures. The challenge is to find a balance between convenience and choice on the one hand, and preservation of local foods and culinary traditions on the other. Governments, businesses, and individuals should work together to achieve this balance and ensure a sustainable future for all.

例題４

【例題4】
Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. Do you agree or disagree with this idea? Give your opinion and examples.

【バンド6.5の回答例】
Some people argue that young people should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. While this idea has its merits, I believe that it is ultimately misguided.

On the one hand, those who argue for this idea believe that it would instill a sense of civic responsibility in young people and help them develop important life skills, such as teamwork and leadership. Moreover, they argue that it would benefit the local community by providing much-needed support for community organizations and initiatives.

On the other hand, those who oppose this idea argue that it would be unfair to require young people to do unpaid work, particularly if it takes away from their leisure time and other activities. Moreover, they argue that it could be counterproductive, as it might create resentment and a sense of obligation rather than genuine enthusiasm for volunteering.

In my opinion, while it is important for young people to be involved in their local community and to develop important life skills, it should be done voluntarily rather than through coercion. This is because volunteering should be a choice and a personal commitment, rather than an obligation. Moreover, voluntary work is more likely to be genuine and effective, as it is motivated by a sense of passion and enthusiasm rather than obligation.

For example, I volunteered at a local homeless shelter during my summer break from university. I did so because I wanted to make a positive impact on my community and to gain experience in social work. This experience was invaluable, as it allowed me to develop important skills such as empathy, communication, and problem-solving. Moreover, it was personally fulfilling and rewarding, as it gave me a sense of purpose and meaning.

In conclusion, while there are merits to the idea of requiring young people to do unpaid work in their free time, it is ultimately misguided. Volunteering should be a personal choice rather than an obligation, as it is more likely to be genuine, effective, and fulfilling. Governments, businesses, and community organizations should work together to promote volunteering as a personal commitment and a way to build strong and resilient communities.

例題５

【例題5】 Some people believe that government funding of the arts is a waste of money and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. Do you agree or disagree with this view? Give your opinion and examples.

【バンド6.5の回答例】 There is a debate about whether government funding of the arts is a waste of money or whether it is an important investment in society. While there are valid arguments on both sides, I believe that government funding of the arts is essential for a healthy and vibrant society.

On the one hand, those who argue that government funding of the arts is a waste of money believe that this money could be better spent on more practical and urgent needs such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Moreover, they argue that the arts are a luxury that only benefit a small portion of society and do not have tangible economic benefits.

On the other hand, those who argue that government funding of the arts is important believe that the arts have a significant impact on society and should be supported. They argue that the arts have intrinsic value as a form of expression and creativity and that they promote social cohesion and diversity. Moreover, they argue that the arts have economic benefits, as they generate employment and tourism.

In my opinion, while it is important to invest in practical needs such as healthcare and education, it is also important to support the arts. This is because the arts are a vital part of human expression and creativity and are essential for promoting social cohesion and diversity. Moreover, the arts have economic benefits, as they create jobs and stimulate tourism.

For example, government funding of museums and galleries not only supports the arts, but it also contributes to the economy by attracting tourists and creating jobs. Furthermore, the arts play an important role in education, as they provide students with opportunities to develop critical thinking, creativity, and empathy.

In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate about government funding of the arts, I believe that it is essential for a healthy and vibrant society. The arts have intrinsic value as a form of expression and creativity and promote social cohesion and diversity. Moreover, they have economic benefits, as they create jobs and stimulate tourism. Governments should continue to invest in the arts to ensure that they remain a vibrant and integral part of society.

例題６

【例題6】
Some people think that the government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to reduce violent crime in society. Do you agree or disagree with this view? Give your opinion and examples.

【バンド6.5の回答例】
There is a debate about whether the government should control the amount of violence in films and on television to reduce violent crime in society. While there are valid arguments on both sides, I believe that censorship is not the most effective solution to reducing violent crime.

On the one hand, those who argue for censorship believe that exposure to violent media can desensitize individuals to violence and make them more likely to commit violent acts. Moreover, they argue that censorship is necessary to protect vulnerable individuals, such as children, from harmful content.

On the other hand, those who oppose censorship argue that it is a violation of free speech and artistic expression. Moreover, they argue that there is little evidence to suggest that exposure to violent media causes violent behavior, and that other factors such as mental illness and social isolation are more important predictors of violent crime.

In my opinion, while it is important to protect vulnerable individuals from harmful content, censorship is not the most effective solution to reducing violent crime. Instead, a more effective approach would be to address the root causes of violence, such as poverty, inequality, and lack of access to mental healthcare.

For example, in countries with high levels of poverty and inequality, there are often higher rates of violent crime. By addressing these root causes through policies such as social welfare programs and access to mental healthcare, it is possible to reduce violent crime without resorting to censorship.

In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate about censorship of violent media, I believe that censorship is not the most effective solution to reducing violent crime. Instead, addressing the root causes of violence through policies such as social welfare programs and access to mental healthcare is a more effective approach.

例題７

【例題7】
Some people believe that children should start learning a foreign language at primary school, while others think children should begin learning a foreign language at secondary school. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

【バンド6.5の回答例】
There is a debate about when children should start learning a foreign language, with some arguing that it should start at primary school, while others believe that it should begin at secondary school. While both sides have valid arguments, I believe that learning a foreign language at an early age has more benefits.

On the one hand, those who argue that children should begin learning a foreign language at secondary school believe that children need to develop strong literacy skills in their first language before they can effectively learn a second language. They also argue that introducing a second language too early can be overwhelming for young learners and can hinder their progress in other subjects.

On the other hand, those who argue for starting language learning at primary school argue that young children have a greater ability to learn languages, as their brains are more receptive to new information. Moreover, they argue that learning a foreign language at an early age promotes cultural awareness and can give children an advantage in the job market.

In my opinion, starting language learning at an early age has more benefits than waiting until secondary school. Learning a foreign language at a young age can help children to develop strong cognitive skills, such as problem-solving and critical thinking. Furthermore, it can promote cultural awareness and prepare them for future opportunities in an increasingly globalized world.

For example, in countries where bilingualism is encouraged from an early age, children are often better prepared for future job opportunities that require multilingual skills. Additionally, early language learning can help to break down cultural barriers and promote understanding between different cultures.

In conclusion, while both sides have valid arguments, I believe that starting language learning at an early age has more benefits than waiting until secondary school. It can help to develop strong cognitive skills and promote cultural awareness, which can prepare children for future opportunities in an increasingly globalized world.

例題８

【例題8】
Some people believe that advertisements should be banned on television. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

【バンド6.5の回答例】
There is a debate about whether advertisements should be banned on television. While there are valid arguments on both sides, I believe that a complete ban on advertisements is not necessary or desirable.

On the one hand, those who argue for a ban on television advertisements believe that they are often misleading and can exploit vulnerable individuals, such as children. Moreover, they argue that advertisements can be a distraction from the content that viewers want to watch, and can even increase the length of television programs.

On the other hand, those who oppose a ban on television advertisements argue that they are an important source of revenue for broadcasters, and that they allow viewers to learn about new products and services. Moreover, they argue that advertisements can be entertaining and creative, and can even be an important cultural artifact.

In my opinion, a complete ban on advertisements is not necessary or desirable. While there are certainly some advertisements that are misleading or exploitative, there are also many advertisements that are informative and even entertaining. Moreover, advertisements are an important source of revenue for broadcasters, which allows them to provide high-quality programming to viewers.

However, I do believe that there should be stricter regulations on the content and placement of advertisements. For example, advertisements that are targeted at children should be carefully regulated to ensure that they are not misleading or exploitative. Furthermore, advertisements should not be placed in the middle of television programs, as this can be a distraction and can disrupt the viewing experience.

In conclusion, while a complete ban on television advertisements is not necessary or desirable, there should be stricter regulations on their content and placement. By regulating advertisements more carefully, it is possible to ensure that they are informative, entertaining, and not exploitative.

例題９

【例題9】
In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on society?

【バンド6.5の回答例】
In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. While this trend presents some challenges, I believe that it has more positive effects on society than negative.

On the one hand, the increasing proportion of older people presents some challenges for society. For example, there may be an increased burden on healthcare systems, as older people are more likely to require medical attention. Additionally, older people may require more social services and support, which can strain government budgets and resources.

On the other hand, the increasing proportion of older people can have many positive effects on society. For example, older people often have more experience and wisdom, which can be a valuable resource for younger generations. Moreover, older people can serve as mentors and role models, and can help to foster intergenerational connections.

Furthermore, older people often have more time and resources to devote to community service and volunteer work, which can be a tremendous benefit to society. Additionally, older people are often more politically engaged and active, which can lead to more responsive and accountable government.

In my opinion, the increasing proportion of older people has more positive effects on society than negative. While there may be some challenges associated with an aging population, these challenges can be addressed through policies and programs that promote healthy aging and support older people. Moreover, the contributions that older people make to society are invaluable, and should be celebrated and encouraged.

In conclusion, while the increasing proportion of older people presents some challenges for society, it has more positive effects than negative. By promoting healthy aging, supporting older people, and recognizing the valuable contributions that they make to society, it is possible to ensure that an aging population is a positive force for change and progress.

例題１０

【例題10】
In many countries, people are moving away from rural areas and towards urban areas. What do you think are the reasons for this trend? Do you think it is a positive or negative trend?

【バンド6.5の回答例】
In many countries, there has been a trend towards urbanization, with people moving away from rural areas and towards urban areas. There are several reasons for this trend, and while there are both positive and negative aspects to it, I believe that overall, it is a positive trend.

One of the main reasons for the trend towards urbanization is economic opportunities. In urban areas, there are often more job opportunities and higher wages than in rural areas. This can be especially attractive to young people who are looking to start their careers or improve their economic prospects.

Moreover, urban areas often offer better access to education, healthcare, and other services. For example, in urban areas, there may be more universities, hospitals, and cultural institutions, which can provide important resources and opportunities for personal growth and development.

On the other hand, there are also some negative aspects to the trend towards urbanization. For example, urban areas can be more expensive to live in, with higher costs of housing and other expenses. Moreover, urban areas can be more crowded and congested, with higher levels of pollution and other environmental problems.

In my opinion, while there are some negative aspects to the trend towards urbanization, overall, it is a positive trend. The economic opportunities, access to services, and cultural richness of urban areas make them attractive places to live and work. Furthermore, the trend towards urbanization can lead to more sustainable and efficient use of resources, as people are able to live in denser communities with better access to public transportation and other infrastructure.

In conclusion, the trend towards urbanization is driven by a desire for economic opportunities, access to services, and cultural richness. While there are some negative aspects to this trend, overall, it is a positive trend that can lead to greater efficiency, sustainability, and personal growth and development.

まとめ

IELTSライティングタスク２で様々なトピックについて序論、本論、結論の構成を使って自分の意見を書き、オンライン英会話で先生に添削とアドバイスをもらうことで、短期集中でも英作文を書く力が養えます。スピーキングのテストの準備にもなるので、しっかり英作文を書く練習をすることで、効率よく勉強できます。